河北承德：经费审计促党建保障落实

百度 具体费用根据车型以到店核算为准。

Archives 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

File:Cerutti mastodon tusk.jpg

File:Cerutti mastodon tusk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Blervis (talk) 04:14, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

names of institutions

Please do not move categories of with legitimate national names to their english language equivalents. In lots of cases that actually causes more confusion than not. Hjart (talk) 15:43, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

That seems to be the common practice both here and on Wikipedia, though, so it's best to be consistent to avoid confusion. FunkMonk (talk) 14:34, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

At least in the nordic countries it's actually common practice to use native names. Look at all our churches (for instance in Category:Churches in Herning Kommune). Using native names makes it so much easier for inexperienced native users to get things right and the Wikis in several neighbouring countries often straight out uses Danish names for Danish places etc. anyway. Hjart (talk) 16:01, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

In this case, they do use the English name in their English online material:[1] FunkMonk (talk) 15:07, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

That's in their English language version. In Commons we prefer using the native name. I'm well aware that in many other countries it's common practice to use some English language version. That's their loss though.

I categorize a lot of newbie uploads and follow quite a few less technical minded contributors, so I think I have a fairly good idea what difficulties they are facing.

I think that to the average contributor categorizing i.e. churches in Poland has got to be hell. Hjart (talk) 19:32, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Deleted portrait of Imam Ali

@FunkMonk Since you contributed to articles related to Shi'ism, you might be familiar with these kinds of portraits. I was curious about your thoughts about my arguments, if you have time. (Recap: My overall claim is that the difference between those conventional Ali portraits are below the threshold of originality, so the claimed "original" is not copyrightable. And we already have a CC license from the painter of the portrait, so that work should stay in Commons.) TheJoyfulTentmaker (talk) 22:39, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

I guess it depends on the status of the other images, and whether they are actually old enough to be PD. What are the other images? FunkMonk (talk) 02:38, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks so much for looking into this, @FunkMonk. Here, I tried to illustrate it with a 4 by 4 image grid. I think it is clearly seen that the deleted image has same degree of similarity to the known public domain image (from the 80s from Iraq) as the claimed-to-be-copyrighted image. TheJoyfulTentmaker (talk) 05:12, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Allosaurus (Gwangi).jpg

And also:

• File:Ammonite (1961).jpg
• File:Children Of The Hydra’s Teeth (1963).jpg
• File:Ghouls (1977).jpg
• File:Giant Bee (1961).jpg
• File:Giant Crab (1961).jpg
• File:Harpy (1963).jpg
• File:Harryhausen monster (1973).jpg
• File:Hydra (1963).jpg
• File:Kali (1973).jpg
• File:Kraken (1981).jpg
• File:Kraken Clash Of The Titans (1981).jpg
• File:Living Skeleton (1958).jpg
• File:Medusa (1981).jpg
• File:Mighty Joe Young (1949).jpg
• File:Minaton (1977).jpg
• File:One Million Years B.C. models.jpg
• File:Sabre Tooth Tiger (1977).jpg
• File:Scorpioch (1981).jpg
• File:Siren (1973).jpg
• File:Skeleton from Jason and the Argonauts film.jpg
• File:Talos (1963).jpg
• File:Troglodyte (1977).jpg
• File:Various Harryhausen Creatures.jpg

Yours sincerely, Marcus Cyron (talk) 14:26, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Arctodus and Smilodon Museum of Natural History Houston Tx.jpg

Copyright status: File:Arctodus and Smilodon Museum of Natural History Houston Tx.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Arctodus and Smilodon Museum of Natural History Houston Tx.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Gastornis in Museum of Natural History Houston Tx - 11459137414.jpg
• File:Uintatherium Museum of Natural History Houston Tx - 11459138544.jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 05:29, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Xenosmilus and Glyptodon Museum of Natural History Houston Tx.jpg

Copyright status: File:Xenosmilus and Glyptodon Museum of Natural History Houston Tx.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Xenosmilus and Glyptodon Museum of Natural History Houston Tx.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:05, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Dodo models at Tring Museum.jpg

Copyright status: File:Dodo models at Tring Museum.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Dodo models at Tring Museum.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:05, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Allosaurus and Torvosaurus in Cincinnati Natural History Museum.jpg

Copyright status: File:Allosaurus and Torvosaurus in Cincinnati Natural History Museum.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Allosaurus and Torvosaurus in Cincinnati Natural History Museum.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Anti-Composite Bot

I see they pester you, too. Annoying bot that seems worthless. Do you just ignore these notices? I wish the owner would fix it.

Good to see another old-timer who's still active. I see you go for the minimalist approach to a Commons user page ;-)

Keep up the good work! Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 21:31, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, well, it seems there are certain licences that are not transferred when you upload images from Flickr, so you have to add them manually as I did here, but it looks like something might be done about it:[2] FunkMonk (talk) 01:30, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

And yikes, now you mention it, I see I've been on Commons/Wikipedia half my lifetime haha... FunkMonk (talk) 01:32, 20 July 2025 (UTC)